over 1.5 · Ipswich Town FC v Sunderland AFC (win)

Leaderboard

focused555call #1611

JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1

VERIFIED CALL

Ipswich Town FC v Sunderland AFC

over 1.5

ENTRY

71¢

RESULT

+41%

CALLER

@focused555

PLACED

2026-08-22 · 13:07 UTC

Nº 0001611R

WIN

+41%

899496263751

JUPCALLERS.FUN

Post to XSave

VerifiedwinMarket ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-818977 i'm picking total to be over 1.5 at 71c #nfa

Record

Posted: Sat, 22 Aug 2026 13:07:06 UTC
Event start: Sat, 22 Aug 2026 14:00:00 UTC
Entry: 71¢ Entry 71¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.As stated by the caller: this market has no order book to price the entry against. The result is still resolved from market data.

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for over 1.5.

derived from exact-score "Ipswich Town FC 2 - 1 Sunderland AFC" (epl-ips-sun-2026-08-22-exact-score): total 3 vs over 1.5

graded Sat, 22 Aug 2026 16:00:12 UTC

Verification details

Message id: 1540708899496263751 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market: POLY-818977 jup.ag ↗
Capture: auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Ipswich Town FC vs. Sunderland AFC"; first parsed side "total to be over 1.5" did not match the event, used "over 1.5"; entry is the caller's stated 71¢, unverified: this side has no market of its own on the event, so no order book exists to price it against (the result is still derived from the fixture's exact-score market)

Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1611). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.