JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Liverpool FC v Nottingham Forest FC
Liverpool FC
ENTRY
69¢
RESULT
-100%
CALLER
@focused555
PLACED
2026-08-29 · 09:53 UTC
Nº 0002036R
LOSS
-100%
923920523376
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedlossLiverpool FC v Nottingham Forest FC: Liverpool FC, -100%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-857159 liverpool to win at 69c They are playing home so not a hard match #nfa

Record

Posted
Sat, 29 Aug 2026 09:53:37 UTC
Event start
Sat, 29 Aug 2026 11:30:00 UTC
Entry
69¢ Entry 69¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.

Outcome

Lost: the market resolved against this pick.

gamma POLY-857159 "Liverpool FC" outcome "Yes" price 0.0005 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Sat, 29 Aug 2026 13:34:23 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1543196923920523376 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Adjacent msgs
1543195690971308103,1543196443555266604,1543197549366739035 (#nfa tag / market link)
Market
POLY-857159 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Liverpool FC vs. Nottingham Forest FC"; entry is the caller's stated 69¢; the order book at the post moment reads 68.5¢ (mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#2036). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.