JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Sevilla FC v Club Atlético de Madrid - More Markets
Over 1.5
ENTRY
70¢
RESULT
+43%
CALLER
@focused555
PLACED
2026-08-29 · 09:48 UTC
Nº 0002034R
WIN
+43%
690971308103
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinSevilla FC v Club Atlético de Madrid - More Markets: Over 1.5, +43%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-857742 over 1.5 goals at 70c #nfa

Record

Posted
Sat, 29 Aug 2026 09:48:43 UTC
Event start
Sat, 29 Aug 2026 19:30:00 UTC
Entry
70¢ Entry 70¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Over 1.5.

gamma POLY-857933 "O/U 1.5" outcome "Over" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Sat, 29 Aug 2026 21:33:20 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1543195690971308103 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Adjacent msgs
1543195574336098374,1543196443555266604,1543196923920523376 (#nfa tag / market link)
Market
POLY-857933 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Sevilla FC vs. Club Atlético de Madrid - More Markets"; side names a prop, resolved on this fixture's companion event "Sevilla FC vs. Club Atlético de Madrid - More Markets" (POLY-857933) — the linked event carries only the match markets; entry is the caller's stated 70¢; the order book at the post moment reads 71.5¢ (mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#2034). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.