Leaderboardfocused555call #1282
JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
RCD Espanyol de Barcelona v Levante UD
levante no
ENTRY
74.5¢
RESULT
+34%
CALLER
@focused555
PLACED
2026-08-16 · 15:23 UTC
Nº 0001282R
WIN
+34%
814260658318
JUPCALLERS.FUN
Post to XSave
VerifiedwinRCD Espanyol de Barcelona v Levante UD: levante no, +34%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-789369 predict: chosing levante to win no They never won playing away #nfa

Record

Posted
Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:23:10 UTC
Event start
Sun, 16 Aug 2026 17:00:00 UTC
Entry
74.5¢

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for levante no.

gamma POLY-789369 "Levante UD" outcome "No" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Sun, 16 Aug 2026 19:11:09 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1538568814260658318 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-789369 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "RCD Espanyol de Barcelona vs. Levante UD"; CORRECTED 2026-08-16: side was "chosing levante" @ null¢, now "levante no", re-priced to 74.5¢ from the mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post) — caller wrote 'predict: chosing levante to win no', a fade of Levante. Two faults: the side was cut at 'to win' so the NO was lost, and the pick verb stayed glued to the name ('chosing levante'), which matches no market on this event because the team word is shared with the Draw bracket's title. Both fixed in the parser the same day.
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1282). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.