JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Paris Saint-Germain v Aston Villa
Paris Saint-Germain
ENTRY
59.5¢
RESULT
+68%
CALLER
@focused555
PLACED
2026-08-12 · 18:50 UTC
Nº 0001035R
WIN
+68%
506768117920
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinParis Saint-Germain v Aston Villa: Paris Saint-Germain, +68%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-773609 predict:paris to win the title They wont lose against aston villa #nfa

Record

Posted
Wed, 12 Aug 2026 18:50:46 UTC
Event start
Wed, 12 Aug 2026 19:00:00 UTC
Entry
59.5¢

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Paris Saint-Germain.

gamma POLY-773609 "Paris Saint-Germain" outcome "Yes" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Wed, 12 Aug 2026 21:56:26 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1537171506768117920 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-773609 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link; side matched to outcome of "Paris Saint-Germain vs. Aston Villa"; side inferred from the linked event: only "Aston Villa yes" is referenced outside the matchup phrase; entry 17¢ from order-book ask at post time; CORRECTED 2026-08-12: side was "Aston Villa" @ 17¢, now "Paris Saint-Germain", re-priced to 59.5¢ from the mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post) — the caller wrote 'predict:paris to win the title'; the colon-with-no-space broke the pattern and inference boarded the opponent he had named only in passing ('they wont lose against aston villa')
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1035). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.