Sunrisers Leeds · The Hundred, Women: Manchester Super Giants v Sunrisers Leeds (win)

Leaderboard

lovingrishicall #985

JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1

VERIFIED CALL

The Hundred, Women: Manchester Super Giants v Sunrisers Leeds

Sunrisers Leeds

ENTRY

87.5¢

RESULT

+14%

CALLER

@lovingrishi

PLACED

2026-08-11 · 15:47 UTC

Nº 0000985R

WIN

+14%

040220053585

JUPCALLERS.FUN

Post to XSave

VerifiedwinMarket ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

EVENT: The Hundred, Women: Sunrisers Leeds PICK: Sunrisers Leeds REASON: The third party beat Leeds in the reverse fixture by 4 wickets, but Leeds have since won their last two and come into this as a must-win game for the Eliminator race. They are currently 4th with 4 wins and 3 losses, and the squad has plenty of proven match-winners. Taking Leeds despite the away ground. LINK: https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-831411 #nfa

Record

Posted: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 15:47:40 UTC
Event start: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 13:45:00 UTC
Entry: 87.5¢

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Sunrisers Leeds.

gamma POLY-831411 "The Hundred, Women: Manchester Super Giants vs Sunrisers Leeds" outcome "Sunrisers Leeds" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:17:40 UTC

Verification details

Message id: 1536763040220053585 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market: POLY-831411 jup.ag ↗
Capture: auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "The Hundred, Women: Manchester Super Giants vs Sunrisers Leeds"; boarded from review queue (was: market already decided when capture saw it: a call posted after the outcome is settled needs a human); hindsight guard cleared by the order book at post time (44.5c, 31s old); entry 44.5¢ from mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post); REGRADE REQUESTED 2026-08-11: previous verdict "loss" cleared — graded on the toss market (same outcome pair listed first in the event); the pick is the match winner and Leeds won the match; entry re-priced 44.5c -> 87.5c from the mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post) (entry 44.5c was the TOSS book at post time (the matcher had resolved the toss market); re-priced from the match-winner book at the same moment)

Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#985). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.