JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Bitcoin above ___ on August 19?
68,000 YES
ENTRY
65¢
SOLD AT
94.4¢
CALLER
@lovingrishi
PLACED
2026-08-19 · 15:37 UTC
Nº 0001463R
WIN
+45%
623701807115
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinBitcoin above ___ on August 19?: 68,000 YES, +45%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-839083 68,000 YES @65 Just a random hunch man. #nfa

Record

Posted
Wed, 19 Aug 2026 15:37:39 UTC
Entry
65¢ → sold 94.4¢ (closed early; scored on the sale price)Entry 65¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.

Outcome

Closed early by the caller at 94.4¢, +29.4¢ on the 65¢ entry.

closed early via #close (msg 1539663722006577192, posted 2026-08-19T15:53:56.895Z): entry 65c -> exit 94.4c (+29.4c realized); no trade within 2min of the close; series interpolated between 92.5c at 15:53:12 and 95.2c at 15:54:14; "#close 68,000"

graded Wed, 19 Aug 2026 15:54:37 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1539659623701807115 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-839083 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Bitcoin above ___ on August 19?"; entry is the caller's stated 65¢; the order book at the post moment reads 53.1¢ (mid at post time (the book moved 16.8¢ between the post and capture, so the live ask is not the ask you saw)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1463). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.