Over 9.5 (Set 1) · Cincinnati Open, Qualification: Christopher O'Connell v Dane Sweeny (win)

Leaderboard

snkcall #972

JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1

VERIFIED CALL

Cincinnati Open, Qualification: Christopher O'Connell v Dane Sweeny

Over 9.5 (Set 1)

ENTRY

50¢

RESULT

+100%

CALLER

@snk

PLACED

2026-08-11 · 13:30 UTC

Nº 0000972R

WIN

+100%

533567803492

JUPCALLERS.FUN

Post to XSave

VerifiedwinMarket ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Cincinnati beggins!!!! ATP1000 - Cincinnati 🇺🇸 Phase: Qualification Risk: 🔴 High Risk Match: 🇦🇺 C. O'Connell x 🇦🇺 D. Sweeny Pick: SET 1 Over 9.5 @ 50c Reason: O'Connell is probably the more complete player in neutral rallies, but Sweeny's serve + first-ball combination gives him a clear path to keeping points short. Sweeny just needs to make this competitive and reproduce enough of what worked in Brisbane. Given O'Connell's current level, that looks very achievable. *Bet responsibly. In sports betting, you lose more than you win in the long term.* #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-831420

Record

Posted: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 13:30:33 UTC
Event start: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 16:10:00 UTC
Entry: 50¢

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Over 9.5 (Set 1).

gamma POLY-831420 "Cincinnati Open, Qualification: Christopher O'Connell vs Dane Sweeny Set 1 O/U 9.5" outcome "Over" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:35:39 UTC

Verification details

Message id: 1536728533567803492 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market: POLY-831420 jup.ag ↗
Capture: auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Cincinnati Open, Qualification: Christopher O'Connell vs Dane Sweeny"; entry provisionally from the caller's stated 50¢ (order-book history unreachable at boarding); side relabelled from "Over 9.5" to "Over 9.5 (Set 1)": the event also lists a Set 2 O/U 9.5, and the stored side must name its set (label fix, Aug 11); REGRADE REQUESTED 2026-08-11: previous verdict "void" cleared — voided on a transient 50/50 at uma=proposed (gamma placeholder shape); the Set 1 O/U 9.5 market settled Over shortly after

Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#972). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.