JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
US Open ATP: Felix Auger-Aliassime v Rinky Hijikata
Auger-Aliassime -2.5 sets
ENTRY
49¢
RESULT
-100%
CALLER
@snk
PLACED
2026-08-31 · 08:13 UTC
Nº 0002242R
LOSS
-100%
377270992956
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedlossUS Open ATP: Felix Auger-Aliassime v Rinky Hijikata: Auger-Aliassime -2.5 sets, -100%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

US Open - New York 🇺🇸 Phase: Main Draw Risk: 🔴 Super High Risk Pick: 🇨🇦 F. Auger-Aliassime -2.5 @ 49c Reason: Auger-Aliassime enters as a heavy favorite with the superior weapons, experience, and hard-court pedigree. His big serve and forehand should allow him to control most points and put consistent pressure on Hijikata’s serve. The Australian is a dangerous and aggressive competitor who has shown strong form lately and possesses the variety to disrupt rhythm if he gets into the match early. However, the gap in power and consistency is significant. This looks like a match where FAA should prevail in straight sets if he starts cleanly. *Bet responsibly. In sports betting, you lose more than you win in the long term.* #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-924350

Record

Posted
Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:13:00 UTC
Event start
Mon, 31 Aug 2026 23:10:00 UTC
Entry
49¢

Outcome

Lost: the market resolved against this pick.

gamma POLY-924350 "US Open ATP: Felix Auger-Aliassime vs Rinky Hijikata Set Handicap +/-2.5" outcome "Auger-Aliassime" price 0.0045 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Tue, 01 Sep 2026 01:17:13 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1543896377270992956 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-924350 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "US Open ATP: Felix Auger-Aliassime vs Rinky Hijikata"
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#2242). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.