Over 9.5 (Set 1) · Todi: Maxim Mrva v Pierluigi Basile (win)

Leaderboard

snkcall #959

JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1

VERIFIED CALL

Todi: Maxim Mrva v Pierluigi Basile

Over 9.5 (Set 1)

ENTRY

51¢

RESULT

+96%

CALLER

@snk

PLACED

2026-08-10 · 18:00 UTC

Nº 0000959R

WIN

+96%

039962206289

JUPCALLERS.FUN

Post to XSave

VerifiedwinMarket ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Time to YOLO 😅 Challenger - 🇮🇹 Todi Phase: Main Draw Risk: 🔴 Super High Risk Game: 🇨🇿 M. Mrva x 🇮🇹 P. Basile Pick: 🇩🇪 SET 1 Over 9.5 @ 51c Reason: The Set 1 numbers are really interesting here. In all five of his big clay events this year where he entered the main draw via wildcard, Basile covered the +1.5 Set 1 spread in his very first match of the tournament — 7-5 vs Hijikata, 6-7 vs Nesterov, 7-6 vs Travaglia, 6-7 vs Brancaccio and 6-7 vs Roca Batalla. Home crowd, good form and a proven ability to keep things close right from the start when getting a wildcard spot is why i like Basile to keep the first set close here. *Bet responsibly. In sports betting, you lose more than you win in the long term.* #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-817954

Record

Posted: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 18:00:20 UTC
Event start: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 18:30:00 UTC
Entry: 51¢

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Over 9.5 (Set 1).

gamma POLY-817954 "Todi: Maxim Mrva vs Pierluigi Basile Set 1 O/U 9.5" outcome "Over" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Mon, 10 Aug 2026 19:37:33 UTC

Verification details

Message id: 1536434039962206289 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market: POLY-817954 jup.ag ↗
Capture: auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Todi: Maxim Mrva vs Pierluigi Basile"; boarded from review queue (was: market already decided when capture saw it (live ask 98c): a call posted after the outcome is settled needs a human); entry provisionally from the caller's stated 51¢ (order-book history unreachable at boarding); side relabelled from "Over 9.5" to "Over 9.5 (Set 1)": the event also lists a Set 2 O/U 9.5 (which resolved Under), and the stored side must name its set (label fix, Aug 11)

Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#959). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.