MatadorJUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
National Bank Open: Alycia Parks v Alexandra Eala
Eala -1.5 sets
ENTRY
58.5¢
RESULT
-100%
CALLER
@Matador
PLACED
2026-08-05 · 17:27 UTC
Nº 0000781R
LOSS
-100%
884198191278
JUPCALLERS.FUN
Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Original Discord message, word for word
Eala vs Parks Watched last Parks game and oh boy she hasnt improved a bit she is reckless forcing every shot Kasintseva was playing terrible, wasnt doing a lot yet still the match was tight cause of mistakes Parks did and now she is playing Eala. In this game Parks power wont help her at all if she starts losing points in beginning she will snap and do even more mistakes and we saw how Eala easy punishes those mistakes. My prediction Eala winning easily so that is safe bet but I am taking Eala -1.5 only because I watched Parks how she played and I dont see her beating any top 30 player #nfa #dyor
Record
- Posted
- Wed, 05 Aug 2026 17:27:41 UTC
- Event start
- Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:50:00 UTC
- Entry
- 58.5¢
Outcome
Lost: the market resolved against this pick.
gamma POLY-794246 "National Bank Open: Alycia Parks vs Alexandra Eala Set Handicap +/-1.5" outcome "Eala" price 0 uma=resolved closed=true
graded Thu, 06 Aug 2026 10:05:15 UTC
Verification details
- Message id
1534613884198191278open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-794246jup.ag ↗- Capture
- auto-captured: #nfa, market auto-discovered + parsed side; event "National Bank Open: Alycia Parks vs Alexandra Eala"; market auto-discovered (no link posted): searched "eala -1.5" with opponent "parks", single active match "National Bank Open: Alycia Parks vs Alexandra Eala"; entry 92¢ from order-book ask at post time; ENTRY CORRECTED 2026-08-06: 92¢ -> 58.5¢ — the 92c was the ask on the +1.5 book: the event lists BOTH directions of the set handicap under one identical title, and the matcher took the wrong half. Eala -1.5 traded 58.5c at the post minute (mid; the ask is unrecoverable a day later). 92c was never a possible price for Eala -1.5 while Eala's own moneyline sat at 83c, since winning 2-0 is a strict subset of winning. Reported by MrD3gen, Aug 6.; REGRADE REQUESTED 2026-08-06: previous verdict "win" cleared — graded against the twin +1.5 market: the event lists both directions of the set handicap under one identical title, and the matcher matched the bare surname onto the wrong half. Matador's message says 'I am taking Eala -1.5 only'. Eala won 2-1, so Eala -1.5 settled at 0 on 'Set Handicap: Eala (-1.5) vs Parks (+1.5)'. Entry re-priced to 58.5c off the same correct book. Reported by MrD3gen, Aug 6.
#781). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.