JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
National Bank Open: Zachary Svajda v Arthur Fils
Arthur Fils
ENTRY
74¢
RESULT
+35%
CALLER
@snk
PLACED
2026-08-05 · 14:18 UTC
Nº 0000777R
WIN
+35%
221545078824
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinNational Bank Open: Zachary Svajda v Arthur Fils: Arthur Fils, +35%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

ATP1000 - Canada Open - 🇨🇦 Montereal Phase: Main Draw Risk: 🟡 Medium Pick: 🇫🇷 A. Fils @ 74c Reason: If Fils is fully fit, I don't think there's much debate about who the better player is in this matchup. His power, athleticism and ability to finish points should simply be too much for Svajda over the course of a match. Svajda remains a very solid hardcourt player with excellent timing and consistency, but he doesn't possess the same firepower as Fils. The only real question mark is Fils fitness. After dealing with a hip issue in Washington and only recently returning to competition, there's still a bit of uncertainty despite him saying he feels 100%. *Bet responsibly. In sports betting, you lose more than you win in the long term.* #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-798285

Record

Posted
Wed, 05 Aug 2026 14:18:18 UTC
Event start
Wed, 05 Aug 2026 17:30:00 UTC
Entry
74¢

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Arthur Fils.

gamma POLY-798285 "National Bank Open: Zachary Svajda vs Arthur Fils" outcome "Arthur Fils" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Wed, 05 Aug 2026 19:18:01 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1534566221545078824 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-798285 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "National Bank Open: Zachary Svajda vs Arthur Fils"; entry provisionally from the caller's stated 74¢ (order-book history unreachable at boarding)
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#777). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.