JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
National Bank Open: Stefanos Tsitsipas v Joao Fonseca
Over 21.5
ENTRY
65¢
RESULT
+54%
CALLER
@snk
PLACED
2026-08-05 · 14:17 UTC
Nº 0000776R
WIN
+54%
983434313850
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinNational Bank Open: Stefanos Tsitsipas v Joao Fonseca: Over 21.5, +54%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

ATP1000 - Canada Open - 🇨🇦 Montereal Phase: Main Draw Risk: 🔴 High Risk Match: 🇧🇷 J. Fonseca x 🇬🇷 S. Tsitsipas Pick: Over 21.5 @ 65c Reason: The key tactical battle is obvious: Fonseca's forehand against Tsitsipas' one-handed backhand. If the Brazilian consistently gets the chance to rush that wing, he'll be in control of many rallies. That's exactly how he won their only previous meeting in the 2025 Davis Cup on indoor hardcourts. Fonseca has barely played in recent weeks, while Tsitsipas already has rhythm and confidence from playing two matches here. I can see arguments for both players. *Bet responsibly. In sports betting, you lose more than you win in the long term.* #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-798202

Record

Posted
Wed, 05 Aug 2026 14:17:21 UTC
Event start
Wed, 05 Aug 2026 15:05:00 UTC
Entry
65¢

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Over 21.5.

gamma POLY-798202 "National Bank Open: Stefanos Tsitsipas vs Joao Fonseca Match O/U 21.5" outcome "Over" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Wed, 05 Aug 2026 17:13:01 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1534565983434313850 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-798202 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "National Bank Open: Stefanos Tsitsipas vs Joao Fonseca"; entry provisionally from the caller's stated 65¢ (order-book history unreachable at boarding)
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#776). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.