JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Soccer — Stjarnan v Vikingur — total goals
Over 2.5
ENTRY
RESULT
WIN
CALLER
@Matador
PLACED
2026-07-09 · 17:11 UTC
Nº 0000047R
WIN
458909249616
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinSoccer — Stjarnan v Vikingur — total goals: Over 2.5

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Stjarnan vs Vikingur Over 2.5 goals Qualification match for conference league, both teams are scoring and receiving a lot of goals regularly in their own leagues, so I think this matchup will result the same. #nfa

Record

Posted
Thu, 09 Jul 2026 17:11:59 UTC

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Over 2.5.

CORRECTED (was loss): the original grade used a PRE-MATCH aggregate 0-0 preview line. Match finished with 3+ goals: beIN 2nd-leg page shows aggregate Vikingur 1-3 Stjarnan after leg one (3-1); community reported 2-1 in-play. Over 2.5 covered. Dispute raised by AG, upheld.

graded Thu, 09 Jul 2026 21:49:20 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1524825458909249616 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Capture
Jul 9 · “Stjarnan vs Vikingur / Over 2.5 goals / Qualification match for conference league, both teams are scoring and receiving a lot of goals regularly in their own leagues, so I think this matchup will result the same. #nfa” · UEFA Conference League qualifier, non-WC · #nfa total-goals Over 2.5 · captured via ClickHouse (author matador5517) · no jup/gamma exact-score market for this qualifier (itsmepampa: “is it on jup? cant seem to find it”) so no entry obtainable; graded from official final score. LOSS — Conf. League 1st qual. leg finished 0-0 (beIN SPORTS aggregate 0-0 into Jul 16 2nd leg; corroborated sportytrader): 0 goals, well under 2.5.
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#47). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.