Leaderboardgianlucabruno3call #437
JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Rome: Danka Kovinic v Julia Riera
Danka Kovinic
ENTRY
50¢
RESULT
-100%
CALLER
@gianlucabruno3
PLACED
2026-07-16 · 18:33 UTC
Nº 0000437R
LOSS
-100%
786711884007
JUPCALLERS.FUN
Post to XSave
VerifiedlossRome: Danka Kovinic v Julia Riera: Danka Kovinic, -100%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Rome: Danka Kovinic vs Julia Riera Kovinic W LIVE 50c #NFA E https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-703256

Record

Posted
Thu, 16 Jul 2026 18:33:53 UTC
Event start
Thu, 16 Jul 2026 17:40:00 UTC
Entry
50¢

Outcome

Lost: the market resolved against this pick.

gamma POLY-703256 "Rome: Danka Kovinic vs Julia Riera" outcome "Danka Kovinic" price 0 uma=resolved; corrected Jul 24 full audit: originally graded WIN off a partial-period market (Set 1/Map 1 Winner) before the matcher fix; the match itself resolved LOSS

graded Mon, 27 Jul 2026 15:30:28 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1527382786711884007 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-703256 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link; side matched to outcome of "Rome: Danka Kovinic vs Julia Riera"; boarded from review queue (was: tagged #nfa but no parseable side/market); SIDE SHOWN AS THE MARKET NAMES IT (Aug 3): "Kovinic" -> "Danka Kovinic" (same bet; the caller's wording is preserved in the message above)
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#437). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.