JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Wimbledon ATP: Jannik Sinner v Novak Djokovic
Sinner -2.5 sets
ENTRY
61¢
RESULT
+64%
CALLER
@gianlucabruno3
PLACED
2026-07-10 · 16:25 UTC
Nº 0000400R
WIN
+64%
073317388418
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinWimbledon ATP: Jannik Sinner v Novak Djokovic: Sinner -2.5 sets, +64%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Wimbledon ATP: Jannik Sinner vs Novak Djokovic Sinner -2.5 SET LIVE (LOW STAKE) 61c #NFA https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-678139

Record

Posted
Fri, 10 Jul 2026 16:25:12 UTC
Event start
Fri, 10 Jul 2026 15:20:00 UTC
Entry
61¢

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Sinner -2.5 sets.

gamma POLY-678139 "Wimbledon ATP: Jannik Sinner vs Novak Djokovic Set Handicap +/-1.5" outcome "Sinner" price 1 uma=resolved

graded Sat, 11 Jul 2026 14:56:21 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1525176073317388418 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-678139 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link; side matched to outcome of "Wimbledon ATP: Jannik Sinner vs Novak Djokovic"; boarded from review queue (was: tagged #nfa but no parseable side/market); SIDE SHOWN AS THE MARKET NAMES IT (Aug 3): "Sinner -2.5 set" -> "Sinner -2.5 sets" (same bet; the caller's wording is preserved in the message above)
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#400). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.