JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Halle Open (ATP) — Altmaier v Medvedev
Medvedev −1.5
ENTRY
63¢
RESULT
-100%
CALLER
@Matador
PLACED
2026-06-19 · 12:55 UTC
Nº 0000038R
LOSS
-100%
278501163088
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedlossHalle Open (ATP) — Altmaier v Medvedev: Medvedev −1.5, -100%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Medvedev vs Altmaier Medvedev looks decent on grass so far, Altmaier is also great on grass but I think its time for Medvedev to step up the play my prediction is: Medvedev -1.5

Record

Posted
Fri, 19 Jun 2026 12:55:59 UTC
Event start
Fri, 19 Jun 2026 15:05:00 UTC
Entry
63¢

Outcome

Lost: the market resolved against this pick.

v1 grading note: Jun 19 · “Medvedev vs Altmaier … my prediction is: Medvedev -1.5” · set-handicap spread (gamma “Set Handicap: Medvedev (-1.5) vs Altmaier (+1.5)”), graded via gamma · captured via Chrome real-time scan · entry from market price at capture (Medvedev -1.5 = 62.5¢) · LOSS: Altmaier won Set 1 (gamma “Set 1 Winner” resolved Altmaier), so Medvedev −1.5 (needs a 2-0 sweep) is mathematically impossible; gamma Set Handicap Medvedev(-1.5) pinned 0.0005 / Altmaier(+1.5) 0.9995

Verification details
Message id
1517513278501163088 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-606186 jup.ag ↗
Capture
Jun 19 · “Medvedev vs Altmaier … my prediction is: Medvedev -1.5” · set-handicap spread (gamma “Set Handicap: Medvedev (-1.5) vs Altmaier (+1.5)”), graded via gamma · captured via Chrome real-time scan · entry from market price at capture (Medvedev -1.5 = 62.5¢) · LOSS: Altmaier won Set 1 (gamma “Set 1 Winner” resolved Altmaier), so Medvedev −1.5 (needs a 2-0 sweep) is mathematically impossible; gamma Set Handicap Medvedev(-1.5) pinned 0.0005 / Altmaier(+1.5) 0.9995
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#38). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.