JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Wimbledon WTA — Pegula v Gauff
Coco Gauff
ENTRY
41¢
RESULT
+144%
CALLER
@gianlucabruno3
PLACED
2026-07-07 · 05:23 UTC
Nº 0000316R
WIN
+144%
405590958212
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinWimbledon WTA — Pegula v Gauff: Coco Gauff, +144%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Wimbledon WTA: Jessica Pegula vs Coco Gauff Gauff W 41c Yes I don’t understand the odds here. Yes of course, Pegula is more expert than Coco. But we can’t see a big difference. So we need to make this prediction against the market https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-671820 #NFA

Record

Posted
Tue, 07 Jul 2026 05:23:34 UTC
Event start
Tue, 07 Jul 2026 12:30:00 UTC
Entry
41¢

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Coco Gauff.

v1 grading note: Jul 7 · “Wimbledon WTA: Jessica Pegula vs Coco Gauff / Gauff W / 41c” + jup.ag link (POLY-671820) + #NFA (author gianlucabruno3) — Coco Gauff moneyline v Jessica Pegula, Wimbledon · captured via ClickHouse reconciliation (1B) · stated entry 41¢ matches Jupiter Gauff buyYes 410000 microUSD at capture · GRADED WIN: Gauff won 2-1 in sets (Pegula took Set 1, Gauff Sets 2 & 3 — gamma set-1/set-2 winners resolved + Total Sets Over 2.5 proposed = 3 sets); Gauff moneyline pinned 0.9995 with umaResolutionStatus proposed, Jupiter isLive=false

Verification details
Message id
1523922405590958212 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-671820 jup.ag ↗
Capture
Jul 7 · “Wimbledon WTA: Jessica Pegula vs Coco Gauff / Gauff W / 41c” + jup.ag link (POLY-671820) + #NFA (author gianlucabruno3) — Coco Gauff moneyline v Jessica Pegula, Wimbledon · captured via ClickHouse reconciliation (1B) · stated entry 41¢ matches Jupiter Gauff buyYes 410000 microUSD at capture · GRADED WIN: Gauff won 2-1 in sets (Pegula took Set 1, Gauff Sets 2 & 3 — gamma set-1/set-2 winners resolved + Total Sets Over 2.5 proposed = 3 sets); Gauff moneyline pinned 0.9995 with umaResolutionStatus proposed, Jupiter isLive=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#316). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.