JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Porto: Pedro Vives Marcos v Eduardo Ribeiro
Eduardo Ribeiro
ENTRY
54¢
RESULT
-100%
CALLER
@lucas_btc_
PLACED
2026-09-01 · 13:55 UTC
Nº 0002344R
LOSS
-100%
930963689562
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedlossPorto: Pedro Vives Marcos v Eduardo Ribeiro: Eduardo Ribeiro, -100%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

sports Porto: Pedro Vives Marcos vs Eduardo Ribeiro Eduardo Ribeiro wins RIBEIRO 54¢ Reasoning: Ribeiro has been more active lately and brings more experience into this one. Clay suits his game a lot better, while Vives Marcos hasn’t played much over the last few months and is still trying to find his rhythm #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-942900

Record

Posted
Tue, 01 Sep 2026 13:55:24 UTC
Event start
Tue, 01 Sep 2026 17:00:00 UTC
Entry
54¢

Outcome

Lost: the market resolved against this pick.

gamma POLY-942900 "Porto: Pedro Vives Marcos vs Eduardo Ribeiro" outcome "Eduardo Ribeiro" price 0.0005 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Tue, 01 Sep 2026 18:47:16 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1544344930963689562 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-942900 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Porto: Pedro Vives Marcos vs Eduardo Ribeiro"; second pick in the same message: "RIBEIRO"; entry 54¢ from the order-book ask at post time
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#2344). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.