JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
CD La Equidad Seguros v AD Pasto
Draw Yes
ENTRY
68¢
RESULT
+47%
CALLER
@Godly_sry
PLACED
2026-08-28 · 02:54 UTC
Nº 0001948R
WIN
+47%
171472748544
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinCD La Equidad Seguros v AD Pasto: Draw Yes, +47%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

CD La Equidad Seguros vs. AD Pasto https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-845130 Draw Yes at @68 Draw Yes @68 #nfa

Record

Posted
Fri, 28 Aug 2026 02:54:57 UTC
Event start
Fri, 28 Aug 2026 01:15:00 UTC
Entry
68¢ Entry 68¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Draw Yes.

gamma POLY-845130 "Draw (CD La Equidad Seguros vs. AD Pasto)" outcome "Yes" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Fri, 28 Aug 2026 13:56:32 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1542729171472748544 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-845130 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "CD La Equidad Seguros vs. AD Pasto"; boarded from review queue (was: linked POLY-845130: no parseable side and no single outcome mentioned); hindsight guard cleared by the order book at post time (67.0c, 27s old); entry is the caller's stated 68¢; the order book at the post moment reads 67¢ (mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1948). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.