JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
San Diego FC v Los Angeles Galaxy
San Diego FC
ENTRY
67¢
SOLD AT
90.1¢
CALLER
@Godly_sry
PLACED
2026-08-30 · 03:52 UTC
Nº 0002107R
WIN
+34%
360061419520
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinSan Diego FC v Los Angeles Galaxy: San Diego FC, +34%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

San Diego FC vs. Los Angeles Galaxy https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-859816 San Diego FC Yes @67c Reason- strong start and stronger lineup #nfa

Record

Posted
Sun, 30 Aug 2026 03:52:13 UTC
Event start
Sun, 30 Aug 2026 02:30:00 UTC
Entry
67¢ → sold 90.1¢ (closed early; scored on the sale price)Entry 67¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.

Outcome

Closed early by the caller at 90.1¢, +23.1¢ on the 67¢ entry.

closed early via #close (msg 1543472557447970856, posted 2026-08-30T04:08:54.029Z): entry 67c -> exit 90.1c (+23.1c realized); no trade within 2min of the close; series interpolated between 88.0c at 04:08:12 and 91.0c at 04:09:12; "#close 94c"

graded Sun, 30 Aug 2026 04:09:35 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1543468360061419520 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-859816 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "San Diego FC vs. Los Angeles Galaxy"; entry is the caller's stated 67¢: the order-book ask at post time read 62¢, better odds than claimed, and a call never pays more than the caller stated
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#2107). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.