Botic van de Zandschulp · Winston-Salem Open: Benjamin Bonzi v Botic van de Zandschulp (loss)

Leaderboard

lucas_btc_call #1924

JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1

VERIFIED CALL

Winston-Salem Open: Benjamin Bonzi v Botic van de Zandschulp

Botic van de Zandschulp

ENTRY

63.5¢

RESULT

-100%

CALLER

@lucas_btc_

PLACED

2026-08-27 · 12:51 UTC

Nº 0001924R

LOSS

-100%

012000014467

JUPCALLERS.FUN

Post to XSave

VerifiedlossMarket ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

sports Winston-Salem Open: Benjamin Bonzi vs Botic van de Zandschulp Botic van de Zandschulp wins Reasoning: Botic is coming into this one on a really strong winning run. His first serve has been solid, he’s been hitting plenty of aces, and he’s faced tougher opponents in recent matches with some good wins #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-918167

Record

Posted: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 12:51:54 UTC
Event start: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 18:05:00 UTC
Entry: 63.5¢

Outcome

Lost: the market resolved against this pick.

gamma POLY-918167 "Winston-Salem Open: Benjamin Bonzi vs Botic van de Zandschulp" outcome "Botic van de Zandschulp" price 0 uma=resolved closed=true

graded Thu, 27 Aug 2026 23:38:45 UTC

Verification details

Message id: 1542517012000014467 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market: POLY-918167 jup.ag ↗
Capture: auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Winston-Salem Open: Benjamin Bonzi vs Botic van de Zandschulp"; boarded from review queue (was: linked POLY-918167: no parseable side and no single outcome mentioned); hindsight guard cleared by the order book at post time (63.5c, 44s old); entry 63.5¢ from mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post)

Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1924). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.