JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Roehampton 2: Inaki Montes v George Loffhagen
George Loffhagen
ENTRY
57¢
RESULT
+75%
CALLER
@Godly_sry
PLACED
2026-08-27 · 12:11 UTC
Nº 0001875R
WIN
+75%
861323091978
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinRoehampton 2: Inaki Montes v George Loffhagen: George Loffhagen, +75%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Roehampton 2: Inaki Montes vs George Loffhagen https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-916374 Loffhagen to win Loffhagen @57c Mid risk #nfa

Record

Posted
Thu, 27 Aug 2026 12:11:34 UTC
Event start
Thu, 27 Aug 2026 11:20:00 UTC
Entry
57¢ Entry 57¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for George Loffhagen.

gamma POLY-916374 "Roehampton 2: Inaki Montes vs George Loffhagen" outcome "George Loffhagen" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Thu, 27 Aug 2026 13:31:53 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1542506861323091978 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-916374 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Roehampton 2: Inaki Montes vs George Loffhagen"; entry is the caller's stated 57¢; the order book at the post moment reads 56¢ (mid at post time (the book moved 8.5¢ between the post and capture, so the live ask is not the ask you saw)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1875). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.