JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Cincinnati Open: Juan Manuel Cerundolo v Felix Auger-Aliassime
Auger-Aliassime -1.5 sets
ENTRY
49¢
SOLD AT
93.5¢
CALLER
@snk
PLACED
2026-08-18 · 23:58 UTC
Nº 0001445R
WIN
+91%
152973680660
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinCincinnati Open: Juan Manuel Cerundolo v Felix Auger-Aliassime: Auger-Aliassime -1.5 sets, +91%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

ATP1000 - Cincinnati 🇺🇸 Phase: Main Draw - LIVE Risk: 🔴 Super High Risk Pick: 🇨🇦 F. Auger-Aliassime -1.5 @ 53c Reason: FAA clearly has the bigger weapons and should win in straight sets. *Bet responsibly. In sports betting, you lose more than you win in the long term.* #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-862070

Record

Posted
Tue, 18 Aug 2026 23:58:00 UTC
Event start
Tue, 18 Aug 2026 23:10:00 UTC
Entry
49¢ → sold 93.5¢ (closed early; scored on the sale price)Entry 49¢: the price the Buy button actually charged the moment the call was posted. The caller wrote 53¢, but that price was not there to buy.

Outcome

Closed early by the caller at 93.5¢, +44.5¢ on the 49¢ entry.

closed early via #close (msg 1539428486698111006, posted 2026-08-19T00:19:12.427Z): entry 49c -> exit 93.5c (+44.5c realized); CLOB history 0.935 at 2026-08-19T00:19:12.000Z (0s from post); no trade printed within 2min of the close and the tape never filled in, so the series point stands; "#close 98c"

graded Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:20:10 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1539423152973680660 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-862070 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Cincinnati Open: Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Felix Auger-Aliassime"; entry 49¢ from the order-book ask at post time (caller stated 53¢)
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1445). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.