JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Sion: Tommaso Compagnucci v Max Dahlin
Tommaso Compagnucci
ENTRY
42¢
RESULT
+138%
CALLER
@best makes jup great
PLACED
2026-08-17 · 07:11 UTC
Nº 0001330R
WIN
+138%
410876092497
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinSion: Tommaso Compagnucci v Max Dahlin: Tommaso Compagnucci, +138%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-856307 Rankings: Tommaso Compagnucci: ~#358–364 Max Dahlin: ~#866–880 Head-to-Head: 0-0 (they have never played each other). Compagnucci is the clear favorite. He holds a significant ranking advantage, has far more experience at Challenger level, and performs well on clay, his preferred surface. Dahlin is a promising 20-year-old but remains much less experienced at this level and currently sits several hundred places lower in the rankings.Tommaso Compagnucci 42C #nfa

Record

Posted
Mon, 17 Aug 2026 07:11:16 UTC
Event start
Tue, 18 Aug 2026 08:05:00 UTC
Entry
42¢ Entry 42¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Tommaso Compagnucci.

gamma POLY-856307 "Sion: Tommaso Compagnucci vs Max Dahlin" outcome "Tommaso Compagnucci" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Tue, 18 Aug 2026 09:44:12 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1538807410876092497 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-856307 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Sion: Tommaso Compagnucci vs Max Dahlin"; entry is the caller's stated 42¢; the order book at the post moment reads 42.5¢ (mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1330). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.