Anton Shepp · Roehampton: Anton Shepp v Mark Ceban (loss)

Leaderboard

best makes jup greatcall #1329

JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1

VERIFIED CALL

Roehampton: Anton Shepp v Mark Ceban

Anton Shepp

ENTRY

59¢

RESULT

-100%

CALLER

@best makes jup great

PLACED

2026-08-17 · 06:58 UTC

Nº 0001329R

LOSS

-100%

115201859685

JUPCALLERS.FUN

Post to XSave

VerifiedlossMarket ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-856323 Shepp, ranked around 490–500, holds a massive ranking advantage and far more consistent Challenger-level experience, which should translate into better shot selection and composure under pressure. Ceban, a low-ranked wildcard near the 2000 mark, is likely to struggle with the pace and consistency required against a more battle-tested opponent.Shepp 59C #nfa

Record

Posted: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 06:58:10 UTC
Event start: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 15:25:00 UTC
Entry: 59¢ Entry 59¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.

Outcome

Lost: the market resolved against this pick.

gamma POLY-856323 "Roehampton: Anton Shepp vs Mark Ceban" outcome "Anton Shepp" price 0.0005 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Mon, 17 Aug 2026 16:21:19 UTC

Verification details

Message id: 1538804115201859685 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market: POLY-856323 jup.ag ↗
Capture: auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Roehampton: Anton Shepp vs Mark Ceban"; entry is the caller's stated 59¢; the order book at the post moment reads 58.5¢ (mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands

Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1329). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.