JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Cincinnati Open: Daniel Merida Aguilar v Zizou Bergs
Daniel Merida Aguilar
ENTRY
54¢
RESULT
+85%
CALLER
@snk
PLACED
2026-08-16 · 19:42 UTC
Nº 0001304R
WIN
+85%
960253562950
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinCincinnati Open: Daniel Merida Aguilar v Zizou Bergs: Daniel Merida Aguilar, +85%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

since im fked might aswell go big 😅 ATP1000 - Cincinnati 🇺🇸 Phase: Main Draw Risk: 🔴 Super High Risk Pick: 🇪🇸 D. Merida Aguilar @ 54c Reason: Merida at this point has absolutely no reason to fear Bergs, as the level he's showing in the North American swing gives him plenty of confidence to play his natural aggressive tennis. Bergs' current US swing hasn't convinced me yet, and he's generally not the player I want to back in hot, humid conditions. His serve + 1 is dangerous, but he can struggle when opponents consistently get returns back and force him to play an extra ball. *Bet responsibly. In sports betting, you lose more than you win in the long term.* #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-852043

Record

Posted
Sun, 16 Aug 2026 19:42:02 UTC
Event start
Sun, 16 Aug 2026 20:50:00 UTC
Entry
54¢

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Daniel Merida Aguilar.

gamma POLY-852043 "Cincinnati Open: Daniel Merida Aguilar vs Zizou Bergs" outcome "Daniel Merida Aguilar" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Sun, 16 Aug 2026 22:16:51 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1538633960253562950 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-852043 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Cincinnati Open: Daniel Merida Aguilar vs Zizou Bergs"; entry provisionally from the caller's stated 54¢ (order-book history unreachable at boarding)
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1304). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.