AFC Ajax · AFC Ajax v SC Heerenveen (loss)

Leaderboard

Gurkcall #1280

JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1

VERIFIED CALL

AFC Ajax v SC Heerenveen

AFC Ajax

ENTRY

86¢

RESULT

-100%

CALLER

@Gurk

PLACED

2026-08-16 · 15:10 UTC

Nº 0001280R

LOSS

-100%

585154220032

JUPCALLERS.FUN

Post to XSave

VerifiedlossMarket ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Pick - Ajax 86c Reason - faith <:pain:1357015377699279049> #nfa #dyor #kyc https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-796344

Record

Posted: Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:10:20 UTC
Event start: Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:45:00 UTC
Entry: 86¢ Entry 86¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.As stated by the caller: this market has no order book to price the entry against. The result is still resolved from market data.

Outcome

Lost: the market resolved against this pick.

gamma POLY-796344 "AFC Ajax" outcome "Yes" price 0 uma=resolved closed=true

graded Mon, 17 Aug 2026 12:05:46 UTC

Verification details

Message id: 1538565585154220032 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Adjacent msgs: 1538564507834777600 (#nfa tag / market link)
Market: POLY-796344 jup.ag ↗
Capture: auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "AFC Ajax vs. SC Heerenveen"; entry is the caller's stated 86¢, unverified: this side has no market of its own on the event, so no order book exists to price it against (the result is still derived from the fixture's exact-score market); SIDE CANONICALISED 2026-08-17: "- Ajax" -> "AFC Ajax" (same bet, proper outcome name)

Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1280). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.