JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Cincinnati Open: Joao Fonseca v Botic van de Zandschulp
Over 9.5 (Set 1)
ENTRY
56¢
RESULT
+79%
CALLER
@snk
PLACED
2026-08-16 · 14:47 UTC
Nº 0001277R
WIN
+79%
725879300217
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinCincinnati Open: Joao Fonseca v Botic van de Zandschulp: Over 9.5 (Set 1), +79%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

ATP1000 - Cincinnati 🇺🇸 Phase: Main Draw Risk: 🔴 High Risk Match: 🇧🇷 J. Fonseca x 🇳🇱 B. van de Zandschulp Pick: SET 1 Over 9.5 @ 56c Reason: I this matchup is much closer than that odd suggests. The H2H is 1–1, both on indoor hard, and more importantly, all four sets from their two meetings went over 9.5 games in Set 1. That's a pretty interesting pattern for this specific matchup. Fonseca also isn't fully battle-tested in Cincinnati yet, as this is his first match here, while Botic already has a win under these humid, physical conditions. His return and ability to absorb pace should make Fonseca work for his holds. I still expect Fonseca to have the higher ceiling, especially with Serve + FH, but Botic should be able to make Fonseca play enough points and keep the opening set tight. *Bet responsibly. In sports betting, you lose more than you win in the long term.* #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-851035

Record

Posted
Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:47:03 UTC
Event start
Sun, 16 Aug 2026 16:45:00 UTC
Entry
56¢

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Over 9.5 (Set 1).

gamma POLY-851035 "Cincinnati Open: Joao Fonseca vs Botic van de Zandschulp Set 1 O/U 9.5" outcome "Over" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Sun, 16 Aug 2026 17:43:27 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1538559725879300217 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-851035 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Cincinnati Open: Joao Fonseca vs Botic van de Zandschulp"; entry provisionally from the caller's stated 56¢ (order-book history unreachable at boarding)
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1277). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.