JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Cincinnati Open: Yannick Hanfmann v Arthur Fils
Fils -1.5 sets
ENTRY
52¢
RESULT
+92%
CALLER
@snk
PLACED
2026-08-15 · 08:47 UTC
Nº 0001170R
WIN
+92%
763486953482
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinCincinnati Open: Yannick Hanfmann v Arthur Fils: Fils -1.5 sets, +92%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

ATP1000 - Cincinnati 🇺🇸 Phase: Main Draw Risk: 🔴 Super High Risk Pick: 🇫🇷 A. Fils -1.5 @ 52c Reason: Fils is a completely different challenge than Van Assche for Hanfmann, he simply doesn't have that many weapons that I trust to consistently hurt Fils. Hanfmann's route is basically serve big, heavy forehand +1 and keep Fils from getting comfortable. While that can absolutely work on these Cincy courts, Fils has the return, movement and athleticism to survive that first wave and turn the points around. I don't see many scenarios where the German can consistently dictate the match for two sets. *Bet responsibly. In sports betting, you lose more than you win in the long term.* #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-851022

Record

Posted
Sat, 15 Aug 2026 08:47:09 UTC
Event start
Sun, 16 Aug 2026 00:10:00 UTC
Entry
52¢

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Fils -1.5 sets.

gamma POLY-851022 "Cincinnati Open: Yannick Hanfmann vs Arthur Fils Set Handicap +/-1.5" outcome "Fils" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Sun, 16 Aug 2026 01:54:20 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1538106763486953482 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-851022 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Cincinnati Open: Yannick Hanfmann vs Arthur Fils"; entry provisionally from the caller's stated 52¢ (order-book history unreachable at boarding)
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1170). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.