JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Wimbledon ATP — Trungelliti v Damm
Trungelliti
ENTRY
25¢
RESULT
-100%
CALLER
@best makes jup great
PLACED
2026-06-28 · 07:39 UTC
Nº 0000107R
LOSS
-100%
066858094592
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedlossWimbledon ATP — Trungelliti v Damm: Trungelliti, -100%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-639456 Martin Damm\'s game is naturally suited to faster conditions, which is why he deserves to start this match as the favourite. However, his odds appear a little short for a player making his Wimbledon debut and one who remains relatively inexperienced at Grand Slam level. Marco Trungelliti, meanwhile, despite playing most of his tennis on clay, has consistently produced competitive performances on faster surfaces as well. He should have a fair chance of making this a closely contested match and is capable of offering a stern challenge to the inexperienced Damm. Marco Trungelliti 25C

Record

Posted
Sun, 28 Jun 2026 07:39:17 UTC
Event start
Mon, 29 Jun 2026 10:05:00 UTC
Entry
25¢

Outcome

Lost: the market resolved against this pick.

v1 grading note: Jun 28 · jup.ag link + analysis “capable of offering a stern challenge to the inexperienced Damm” → “Marco Trungelliti 25C” · backs Trungelliti (underdog) to win · LOSS: Jupiter Marco Trungelliti result:no, Martin Damm result:yes (isLive=false) — Damm advanced

Verification details
Message id
1520695066858094592 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-639456 jup.ag ↗
Capture
Jun 28 · jup.ag link + analysis “capable of offering a stern challenge to the inexperienced Damm” → “Marco Trungelliti 25C” · backs Trungelliti (underdog) to win · LOSS: Jupiter Marco Trungelliti result:no, Martin Damm result:yes (isLive=false) — Damm advanced
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#107). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.