JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Hangzhou Open, Qualification: Masamichi Imamura v Rio Noguchi
Rio Noguchi
ENTRY
66¢
RESULT
+52%
CALLER
@mockingbirddd
PLACED
2026-09-21 · 18:49 UTC
Nº 0003477R
WIN
+52%
631376248886
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinHangzhou Open, Qualification: Masamichi Imamura v Rio Noguchi: Rio Noguchi, +52%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Hangzhou Open, Qualification: Masamichi Imamura vs Rio Noguchi Picking Rio Noguchi ml 65c Rio Noguchi generally holds a higher position in the ATP rankings and has more extensive experience playing at the Challenger and ATP tour qualification levels compared to Masamichi Imamura. #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1059564

Record

Posted
Mon, 21 Sep 2026 18:49:13 UTC
Event start
Tue, 22 Sep 2026 07:30:00 UTC
Entry
66¢ Entry 66¢: the price the Buy button actually charged the moment the call was posted. The caller wrote 65¢, but that price was not there to buy.

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Rio Noguchi.

gamma POLY-1059564 "Hangzhou Open, Qualification: Masamichi Imamura vs Rio Noguchi" outcome "Rio Noguchi" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Tue, 22 Sep 2026 08:30:14 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1551666631376248886 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-1059564 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Hangzhou Open, Qualification: Masamichi Imamura vs Rio Noguchi"; entry 66¢ from the order-book ask at post time (caller stated 65¢); entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#3477). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.