JD Gaming (Game 2) · LoL: Invictus Gaming v JD Gaming (BO5) - LPL Regional Finals Playoffs (loss)

Leaderboard

jabat1369call #3450

JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1

VERIFIED CALL

LoL: Invictus Gaming v JD Gaming (BO5) - LPL Regional Finals Playoffs

JD Gaming (Game 2)

ENTRY

60¢

RESULT

-100%

CALLER

@jabat1369

PLACED

2026-09-19 · 10:11 UTC

Nº 0003450R

LOSS

-100%

482235863180

JUPCALLERS.FUN

Post to XSave

VerifiedlossMarket ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

LoL: Invictus Gaming vs JD Gaming (BO5) - LIVE Yesterday JD Gaming looked solid with a reverse sweep win after dropping the first game to Team WE. Will history repeat itself? It sure looks like it Picking JD Gaming Game 2 Winner 60c #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1042949

Record

Posted: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 10:11:10 UTC
Event start: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 09:00:00 UTC
Entry: 60¢ Entry 60¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.

Outcome

Lost: the market resolved against this pick.

gamma POLY-1042949 "Game 2 Winner" outcome "JD Gaming" price 0 uma=resolved closed=true

graded Sun, 20 Sep 2026 22:31:16 UTC

Verification details

Message id: 1550811482235863180 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market: POLY-1042949 jup.ag ↗
Capture: auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "LoL: Invictus Gaming vs JD Gaming (BO5) - LPL Regional Finals Playoffs"; boarded from review queue (was: no market for "JD Gaming Game 2 Winner" on this event or its companion pages (More Markets, First Team to Score, Exact Score, Corners, Second Half, Player Props), and nothing else can grade it: likely a typo in the line or bracket, needs a human); hindsight guard cleared by the order book at post time (61.5c, 0s old); entry is the caller's stated 60¢; the order book at the post moment reads 61.5¢ (mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands (the price-history mid at the post moment, 61.5¢, is within tolerance of the claim); entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post

Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#3450). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.