JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Bayer 04 Leverkusen v RB Leipzig - More Markets
Over 2.5
ENTRY
75¢
RESULT
-100%
CALLER
@vladimir5505
PLACED
2026-09-20 · 12:11 UTC
Nº 0003404R
LOSS
-100%
212535328889
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedlossBayer 04 Leverkusen v RB Leipzig - More Markets: Over 2.5, -100%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

La Liga: Atlético Madrid vs Real Madrid ⚽️ Madrid derbies are usually intense, but both teams have enough quality in attack to make this an open game. Picking Over 2.5 Goals @63¢ #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-980494

Record

Posted
Sun, 20 Sep 2026 12:11:44 UTC
Event start
Sun, 20 Sep 2026 13:30:00 UTC
Entry
75¢ Entry 75¢: the price the Buy button actually charged the moment the call was posted. The caller wrote 63¢, but that price was not there to buy.

Outcome

Lost: the market resolved against this pick.

gamma POLY-980892 "O/U 2.5" outcome "Over" price 0.005 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Sun, 20 Sep 2026 15:26:16 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1551204212535328889 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-980892 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Bayer 04 Leverkusen vs. RB Leipzig - More Markets"; side names a prop, resolved on this fixture's companion event "Bayer 04 Leverkusen vs. RB Leipzig - More Markets" (POLY-980892) — the linked event carries only the match markets; entry 75¢ from the order-book ask at post time (caller stated 63¢); entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#3404). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.