JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Valorant: Team Falcons VEGA v Gen.G GC (BO5) - VCT Game Changers Pacific Playoffs
Gen.G GC (Map 2)
ENTRY
54¢
RESULT
-100%
CALLER
@jabat1369
PLACED
2026-09-19 · 08:15 UTC
Nº 0003310R
LOSS
-100%
342161760276
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedlossValorant: Team Falcons VEGA v Gen.G GC (BO5) - VCT Game Changers Pacific Playoffs: Gen.G GC (Map 2), -100%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Valorant: Falcons VEGA vs Gen.GC (BO5) LIVE Map two is Split. They have a 100% win rate against any Game Changers team. I think they'll take the second map easily Picking Gen.GC Game 2 Winner 49c #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1043812

Record

Posted
Sat, 19 Sep 2026 08:15:22 UTC
Event start
Sat, 19 Sep 2026 07:10:00 UTC
Entry
54¢ Entry 54¢: the price the Buy button actually charged the moment the call was posted. The caller wrote 49¢, but that price was not there to buy.

Outcome

Lost: the market resolved against this pick.

gamma POLY-1043812 "Map 2 Winner" outcome "Gen.G GC" price 0.0005 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Sat, 19 Sep 2026 08:58:19 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1550782342161760276 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-1043812 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Valorant: Team Falcons VEGA vs Gen.G GC (BO5) - VCT Game Changers Pacific Playoffs"; entry 79¢ from the order-book ask at post time (caller stated 49¢); entry corrected to 54¢ from the trade tape: the 79¢ this boarded at was an order-book ask that nothing traded near, while the same map printed 49, 50.8, 51 and 54¢ in the minute before the call and 50 and 47.5¢ three minutes after it. The caller wrote 49¢ himself; 54¢ is the nearest trade and the worse of the two, so it is the entry
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#3310). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.