Natus Vincere +1.5 maps · Counter-Strike: MOUZ v Natus Vincere (BO3) - StarLadder StarSeries Playoffs (win)

Leaderboard

jabat1369call #3286

JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1

VERIFIED CALL

Counter-Strike: MOUZ v Natus Vincere (BO3) - StarLadder StarSeries Playoffs

Natus Vincere +1.5 maps

ENTRY

66¢

RESULT

+52%

CALLER

@jabat1369

PLACED

2026-09-18 · 09:30 UTC

Nº 0003286R

WIN

+52%

776671576077

JUPCALLERS.FUN

Post to XSave

VerifiedwinMarket ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Counter-Strike: MOUZ vs Natus Vincere (BO3) Mouz very shaky synergy yesterday against NRG which way below rank than NAVI. Maybe fatigue after traveling from BLAST Open Porto. With such a bad head-to-head record, they’ve had more than enough time to properly prep for this game. They should get 1 map Picking NAVI +1.5 Game Handicap 66c #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1038821

Record

Posted: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 09:30:10 UTC
Event start: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 10:00:00 UTC
Entry: 66¢ Entry 66¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Natus Vincere +1.5 maps.

gamma POLY-1038821 "Map Handicap: MOUZ (-1.5) vs Natus Vincere (+1.5)" outcome "Natus Vincere" price 1 uma=resolved closed=true

graded Fri, 18 Sep 2026 20:12:22 UTC

Verification details

Message id: 1550438776671576077 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market: POLY-1038821 jup.ag ↗
Capture: auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Counter-Strike: MOUZ vs Natus Vincere (BO3) - StarLadder StarSeries Playoffs"; boarded from review queue (was: no market for "NAVI +1.5 Game Handicap" on this event or its More Markets page, and nothing else can grade it: likely a typo in the line or bracket, needs a human); hindsight guard cleared by the order book at post time (64.5c, 54s old); entry is the caller's stated 66¢; the order book at the post moment reads 64.5¢ (mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands (the price-history mid at the post moment, 64.5¢, is within tolerance of the claim); entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post

Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#3286). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.