JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Sevilla FC v Valencia CF
Valencia CF no
ENTRY
78¢
RESULT
+28%
CALLER
@vibesxephon
PLACED
2026-09-11 · 08:22 UTC
Nº 0002899R
WIN
+28%
119489056768
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinSevilla FC v Valencia CF: Valencia CF no, +28%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Sevilla vs. Valencia Sevilla have 7 points from 4 games and look the more solid side, while Valencia are barely scoring right now. Backing the double chance against Valencia winning away from home against a team in clearly better form. Picking Valencia NO #nfa 78c https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-940179

Record

Posted
Fri, 11 Sep 2026 08:22:50 UTC
Event start
Fri, 11 Sep 2026 19:00:00 UTC
Entry
78¢ Entry 78¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Valencia CF no.

gamma POLY-940179 "Valencia CF" outcome "No" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Fri, 11 Sep 2026 21:10:14 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1547885119489056768 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-940179 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link; side matched to outcome of "Sevilla FC vs. Valencia CF"; boarded from review queue (was: side "the double chance" does not match event "Sevilla FC vs. Valencia CF" (POLY-940179)); the written side "the double chance" matched no market here, so it was read from the event: only "Valencia CF no" is referenced outside the matchup phrase; entry is the caller's stated 78¢; the order book at the post moment reads 77.5¢ (mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands (the price-history mid at the post moment, 77.5¢, is within tolerance of the claim)
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#2899). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.