JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
US Open ATP: Jesper de Jong v Francesco Passaro
Jesper de Jong
ENTRY
57¢
TO WIN
+75%
CALLER
@sunkissedsage
PLACED
2026-09-01 · 19:36 UTC
Nº 0002372R
OPEN
NOW 31.5¢
648792715264
JUPCALLERS.FUN
Big money on this marketwhale tape →
$17,000boughtFrancesco Passaro@ 42¢against this call-$270k11h ago
$11,142boughtFrancesco Passaro@ 43¢against this call+$2.4m19h ago
$10,653soldFrancesco Passaro@ 62¢with this call-$270k1h ago

Public trade tape. A big print can be a hedge or a market maker; it is context, not a call.

VerifiedpendingUS Open ATP: Jesper de Jong v Francesco Passaro: Jesper de JongMarket ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-928117 Pick: Jong 57c Head to head Jesper de Jong leads 2-0. Francesco Passaro has not beaten a top-100 player since July 2025 and apparently his fitness has been a major problem in recent months. So going with the Dutchie. #nfa

Record

Posted
Tue, 01 Sep 2026 19:36:00 UTC
Event start
Wed, 02 Sep 2026 19:00:00 UTC
Entry
57¢ Entry 57¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.
Verification details
Message id
1544430648792715264 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-928117 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "US Open ATP: Jesper de Jong vs Francesco Passaro"; entry is the caller's stated 57¢; the order book at the post moment reads 56.5¢ (mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#2372). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.