JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
West Ham United FC v Wolverhampton Wanderers FC
West Ham United FC no
ENTRY
55¢
RESULT
-100%
CALLER
@crypto_strategy
PLACED
2026-09-01 · 14:29 UTC
Nº 0002356R
LOSS
-100%
505211449374
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedlossWest Ham United FC v Wolverhampton Wanderers FC: West Ham United FC no, -100%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Next EFL match: West Ham United vs Wolverhampton Wanderers https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-873865 This promises to be a dramatic encounter,West Ham has the home-field advantage, but Wolverhampton is not an easy team to beat. I’m not taking sides, so I’m betting against a West Ham "NO" win tonight at odds of 55¢. #NFA

Record

Posted
Tue, 01 Sep 2026 14:29:28 UTC
Event start
Tue, 01 Sep 2026 18:45:00 UTC
Entry
55¢

Outcome

Lost: the market resolved against this pick.

gamma POLY-873865 "West Ham United FC" outcome "No" price 0.0005 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Tue, 01 Sep 2026 20:43:19 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1544353505211449374 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-873865 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link; side matched to outcome of "West Ham United FC vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers FC"; boarded from review queue (was: side "sides, so I’m betting" does not match event "West Ham United FC vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers FC" (POLY-873865)); the written side "sides, so I’m betting" matched no market here, so it was read from the event: only "West Ham United FC no" is referenced outside the matchup phrase
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#2356). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.