JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Zhangjiagang: Koki Matsuda v Jake Delaney
Koki Matsuda
ENTRY
64¢
RESULT
+56%
CALLER
@_varsha7
PLACED
2026-09-01 · 05:30 UTC
Nº 0002325R
WIN
+56%
854096842753
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinZhangjiagang: Koki Matsuda v Jake Delaney: Koki Matsuda, +56%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Zhangjiagang: Koki Matsuda vs Jake Delaney Better aces and serves Matsuda @64c #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-942891

Record

Posted
Tue, 01 Sep 2026 05:30:26 UTC
Event start
Tue, 01 Sep 2026 04:30:00 UTC
Entry
64¢ Entry 64¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Koki Matsuda.

gamma POLY-942891 "Zhangjiagang: Koki Matsuda vs Jake Delaney" outcome "Koki Matsuda" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Tue, 01 Sep 2026 06:26:17 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1544217854096842753 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-942891 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Zhangjiagang: Koki Matsuda vs Jake Delaney"; entry is the caller's stated 64¢; the order book at the post moment reads 65.5¢ (mid at post time (the book was moving 2.9¢ a minute and we read it 50s after the post, so the live ask is our lag and not your price)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#2325). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.