Leaderboardcrypto_strategycall #2170
JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
SC Cambuur-Leeuwarden v FC Twente
FC Twente
ENTRY
75¢
RESULT
+33%
CALLER
@crypto_strategy
PLACED
2026-08-30 · 15:45 UTC
Nº 0002170R
WIN
+33%
924804653146
JUPCALLERS.FUN
Post to XSave
VerifiedwinSC Cambuur-Leeuwarden v FC Twente: FC Twente, +33%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Tonight's action moves to the Dutch league: FC Twente vs SC Cambuur https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-865619 Twente is a dark horse in the league, and I'm backing them to win at odds of 75¢ I predict a decisive 3-0 victory #NFA

Record

Posted
Sun, 30 Aug 2026 15:45:44 UTC
Event start
Sun, 30 Aug 2026 18:00:00 UTC
Entry
75¢

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for FC Twente.

gamma POLY-865619 "FC Twente" outcome "Yes" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Sun, 30 Aug 2026 19:53:12 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1543647924804653146 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-865619 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link; side matched to outcome of "SC Cambuur-Leeuwarden vs. FC Twente"; boarded from review queue (was: side "them" does not match event "SC Cambuur-Leeuwarden vs. FC Twente" (POLY-865619)); the written side "them" matched no market here, so it was read from the event: only "FC Twente" is referenced outside the matchup phrase
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#2170). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.