JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Crystal Palace FC v Manchester City FC
Manchester City FC
ENTRY
58¢
RESULT
+72%
CALLER
@crypto_strategy
PLACED
2026-08-28 · 14:44 UTC
Nº 0001956R
WIN
+72%
767222968330
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinCrystal Palace FC v Manchester City FC: Manchester City FC, +72%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Tonight, I’m going to predict the outcomes of three English Premier League matches. First up is Crystal Palace vs Manchester City. https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-851799 I’m leaning towards Manchester City winning the match, with odds of 58¢. The reason is clear City has a squad full of star players, especially Haaland. #nfa

Record

Posted
Fri, 28 Aug 2026 14:44:37 UTC
Event start
Fri, 28 Aug 2026 19:00:00 UTC
Entry
58¢

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Manchester City FC.

gamma POLY-851799 "Manchester City FC" outcome "Yes" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Fri, 28 Aug 2026 21:07:19 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1542907767222968330 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-851799 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link; side matched to outcome of "Crystal Palace FC vs. Manchester City FC"; boarded from review queue (was: side "the outcomes of three English Premier League matches." does not match event "Crystal Palace FC vs. Manchester City FC" (POLY-851799)); the written side "the outcomes of three English Premier League matches." matched no market here, so it was read from the event: only "Manchester City FC" is referenced outside the matchup phrase
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1956). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.