JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Sevilla FC v Club Atlético de Madrid
Club Atlético de Madrid
ENTRY
47¢
RESULT
+113%
CALLER
@crypto_strategy
PLACED
2026-08-26 · 15:30 UTC
Nº 0001835R
WIN
+113%
462082465792
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinSevilla FC v Club Atlético de Madrid: Club Atlético de Madrid, +113%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-857742 Regarding the La Liga match between Sevilla FC vs Atlético de Madrid I find this to be a compelling matchup, as both teams possess strong squads However, I am backing Atlético de Madrid to win at odds of 47¢. My reasoning is that Atlético boasts a potent attack—featuring the young talent Álvarez—and a championship mentality #NFA

Record

Posted
Wed, 26 Aug 2026 15:30:12 UTC
Event start
Sat, 29 Aug 2026 19:30:00 UTC
Entry
47¢ Entry 47¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Club Atlético de Madrid.

gamma POLY-857742 "Club Atlético de Madrid" outcome "Yes" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Sat, 29 Aug 2026 21:35:16 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1542194462082465792 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-857742 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Sevilla FC vs. Club Atlético de Madrid"; boarded from review queue (was: linked POLY-857742: no parseable side and no single outcome mentioned); entry is the caller's stated 47¢; the order book at the post moment reads 46.5¢ (mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1835). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.