JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
RCD Espanyol de Barcelona v Real Madrid CF
Real Madrid CF
ENTRY
68¢
RESULT
+47%
CALLER
@crypto_strategy
PLACED
2026-08-22 · 13:41 UTC
Nº 0001829R
WIN
+47%
641671512194
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinRCD Espanyol de Barcelona v Real Madrid CF: Real Madrid CF, +47%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Tonight\'s match: RCD Espanyol de Barcelona vs Real Madrid I am fully backing Real Madrid at odds of 68¢ "yes" My reason for supporting Real Madrid is that, statistically, they hold the upper hand in matches against RCD Espanyol #NFA https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-819514

Record

Posted
Sat, 22 Aug 2026 13:41:50 UTC
Event start
Sat, 22 Aug 2026 19:30:00 UTC
Entry
68¢ Entry 68¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Real Madrid CF.

gamma POLY-819514 "Real Madrid CF" outcome "Yes" price 1 uma=resolved closed=true

graded Wed, 26 Aug 2026 15:46:50 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1540717641671512194 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-819514 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "RCD Espanyol de Barcelona vs. Real Madrid CF"; boarded from review queue (was: linked POLY-819514: no parseable side and no single outcome mentioned); hindsight guard cleared by the order book at post time (67.5c, 40s old); entry is the caller's stated 68¢; the order book at the post moment reads 67.5¢ (mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1829). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.