JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Roehampton: Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida v Peter Makk
Peter Makk
ENTRY
52¢
RESULT
-100%
CALLER
@spacegemstone0x
PLACED
2026-08-18 · 13:40 UTC
Nº 0001823R
LOSS
-100%
771492204624
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedlossRoehampton: Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida v Peter Makk: Peter Makk, -100%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Roehampton: Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida vs Peter Makk MAKK 52¢ Pucinelli\'s record on Hardcourts: 2022–2026 Challenger/ATP Main Draws: 3 wins and 11 losses. I would expect him to struggle playing on this surface vs Makk (relatively new to the full-time ATP pro tour that\'s why his ranking is low) who is very much familiar play-style is more inclined for hardcourts. I expect MAKK to win this match https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-866085 #nfa

Record

Posted
Tue, 18 Aug 2026 13:40:34 UTC
Event start
Tue, 18 Aug 2026 15:30:00 UTC
Entry
52¢ Entry 52¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.

Outcome

Lost: the market resolved against this pick.

gamma POLY-866085 "Roehampton: Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida vs Peter Makk" outcome "Peter Makk" price 0 uma=resolved closed=true

graded Wed, 26 Aug 2026 15:45:50 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1539267771492204624 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-866085 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Roehampton: Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida vs Peter Makk"; boarded from review queue (was: linked POLY-866085: no parseable side and no single outcome mentioned); hindsight guard cleared by the order book at post time (51.5c, 21s old); entry is the caller's stated 52¢; the order book at the post moment reads 51.5¢ (mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1823). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.