JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Bitcoin above ___ on August 26?
78,000 no
ENTRY
52.1¢
RESULT
-100%
CALLER
@vince.
PLACED
2026-08-26 · 15:33 UTC
Nº 0001820R
LOSS
-100%
228004327535
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedlossBitcoin above ___ on August 26?: 78,000 no, -100%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

78.000 No 45c #nfa Risky 6/10 https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-876119

Record

Posted
Wed, 26 Aug 2026 15:33:14 UTC
Entry
52.1¢ Entry 52.1¢: the price the Buy button actually charged the moment the call was posted. The caller wrote 45¢, but that price was not there to buy.

Outcome

Lost: the market resolved against this pick.

gamma POLY-876119 "78,000" outcome "No" price 0.0005 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:18:03 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1542195228004327535 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-876119 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link; side matched to outcome of "Bitcoin above ___ on August 26?"; boarded from review queue (was: side "78.000 No" does not match event "Bitcoin above ___ on August 26?" (POLY-876119)); the written side "78.000 No" matched no market here, so it was read from the event: only "78,000 no" is referenced outside the matchup phrase; entry 52.1¢ from the order-book ask at post time (caller stated 45¢)
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1820). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.