JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Winston-Salem Open: Botic van de Zandschulp v Adolfo Vallejo
Botic van de Zandschulp
ENTRY
59¢
RESULT
+69%
CALLER
@ethanbigbrother
PLACED
2026-08-25 · 15:10 UTC
Nº 0001764R
WIN
+69%
221432442982
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinWinston-Salem Open: Botic van de Zandschulp v Adolfo Vallejo: Botic van de Zandschulp, +69%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

US Open 🇺🇸 Stage: Qualification Confidence: 🟠 low risk (85%) Forecast: van de Zandschulp 50c https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-899854 #nfa

Record

Posted
Tue, 25 Aug 2026 15:10:55 UTC
Event start
Tue, 25 Aug 2026 18:00:00 UTC
Entry
59¢ Entry 59¢: the price the Buy button actually charged the moment the call was posted. The caller wrote 50¢, but that price was not there to buy.

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Botic van de Zandschulp.

gamma POLY-899854 "Winston-Salem Open: Botic van de Zandschulp vs Adolfo Vallejo" outcome "Botic van de Zandschulp" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Tue, 25 Aug 2026 19:25:09 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1541827221432442982 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-899854 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link; side matched to outcome of "Winston-Salem Open: Botic van de Zandschulp vs Adolfo Vallejo"; side inferred from the linked event: only "Botic van de Zandschulp" is referenced outside the matchup phrase; entry 59¢ from the order-book ask at post time (caller stated 50¢)
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1764). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.