JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Winston-Salem Open: Arthur Fery v Cruz Hewitt
Arthur Fery
ENTRY
87¢
RESULT
+15%
CALLER
@surfmor
PLACED
2026-08-25 · 03:34 UTC
Nº 0001736R
WIN
+15%
871020744794
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinWinston-Salem Open: Arthur Fery v Cruz Hewitt: Arthur Fery, +15%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Tennis: Arthur Fery vs Cruz Hewitt (BO3) Reasoning: All models agree that Arthur Fery holds a decisive edge in tour-level experience, baseline consistency, and physical maturity over the teenage Cruz Hewitt. While Claude appropriately grounds the assessment close to the 82% market baseline, Gemini and Grok emphasize the massive developmental tier gap. Hewitt possesses upside but lacks the sustained rally tolerance needed to consistently penetrate Fery's disciplined counter-punching on outdoor hard. A straightforward straight-sets win for Fery is the consensus expectation. Match winner Arthur Fery : 81c #nfa #dyor https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-906979

Record

Posted
Tue, 25 Aug 2026 03:34:08 UTC
Event start
Tue, 25 Aug 2026 20:45:00 UTC
Entry
87¢ Entry 87¢: the price the Buy button actually charged the moment the call was posted. The caller wrote 81¢, but that price was not there to buy.

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Arthur Fery.

gamma POLY-906979 "Winston-Salem Open: Arthur Fery vs Cruz Hewitt" outcome "Arthur Fery" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Tue, 25 Aug 2026 22:14:08 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1541651871020744794 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-906979 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Winston-Salem Open: Arthur Fery vs Cruz Hewitt"; entry 87¢ from the order-book ask at post time (caller stated 81¢)
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1736). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.