JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Winston-Salem Open, Qualification: Felix Balshaw v Sebastian Gorzny
Felix Balshaw
ENTRY
68¢
RESULT
+47%
CALLER
@surfmor
PLACED
2026-08-23 · 03:38 UTC
Nº 0001651R
WIN
+47%
277751922728
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinWinston-Salem Open, Qualification: Felix Balshaw v Sebastian Gorzny: Felix Balshaw, +47%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Tennis: Felix Balshaw vs Sebastian Gorzny (BO3) Reasoning: All models unanimously favor Felix Balshaw, citing the substantial ranking disparity (#254 vs #782) and his established professional tour baseline versus Sebastian Gorzny's limited, collegiate-heavy resume. While Gorzny's serve on outdoor hard introduces some qualifying variance, Balshaw's volume, recent 40-22 form, and superior rally consistency provide a distinct edge. Reconciling market data (66%) and research-backed estimates, Balshaw is a firm favorite. Match winner Felix Balshaw : 66c #nfa #dyor https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-892296

Record

Posted
Sun, 23 Aug 2026 03:38:50 UTC
Event start
Sun, 23 Aug 2026 17:05:00 UTC
Entry
68¢ Entry 68¢: the price the Buy button actually charged the moment the call was posted. The caller wrote 66¢, but that price was not there to buy.

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Felix Balshaw.

gamma POLY-892296 "Winston-Salem Open, Qualification: Felix Balshaw vs Sebastian Gorzny" outcome "Felix Balshaw" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Sun, 23 Aug 2026 19:26:34 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1540928277751922728 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-892296 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Winston-Salem Open, Qualification: Felix Balshaw vs Sebastian Gorzny"; entry 68¢ from the order-book ask at post time (caller stated 66¢)
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1651). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.