JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Everton FC v Crystal Palace FC - More Markets
Over 1.5
ENTRY
75¢
RESULT
+33%
CALLER
@vince.
PLACED
2026-08-22 · 15:13 UTC
Nº 0001633R
WIN
+33%
641468719205
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinEverton FC v Crystal Palace FC - More Markets: Over 1.5, +33%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Everton FC vs. Crystal Palace FC Over 1.5 75c #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-818984

Record

Posted
Sat, 22 Aug 2026 15:13:14 UTC
Event start
Sat, 22 Aug 2026 14:00:00 UTC
Entry
75¢ Entry 75¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Over 1.5.

gamma POLY-819358 "O/U 1.5" outcome "Over" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Sat, 22 Aug 2026 16:03:20 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1540740641468719205 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-819358 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Everton FC vs. Crystal Palace FC - More Markets"; boarded from review queue (was: no order book for "Over 1.5": nobody is selling, so the shown price is a placeholder, not a price — a call needs a tradable ask); side names a prop, resolved on this fixture's companion event "Everton FC vs. Crystal Palace FC - More Markets" (POLY-819358) — the linked event carries only the match markets; entry is the caller's stated 75¢; the order book at the post moment reads 76.5¢ (mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1633). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.